Bar Associations and Human Rights Organizations argue that the Supreme Court should reverse the judgement of the Fifth Circuit and remand this action for review and reconsideration of the violation of Mr. Medellin's Vienna Convention rights in a manner consistent with Avena. In the Avena case, the ICJ definitively interpreted the Vienna Convention as mandating specific procedural relief in the case of Mr. Medellin and fifty other Mexican death row inmates in U.S. prisons who were not informed of their right to seek consular assistance.
|
Amicus Briefing
Brief of Amici Curiae in Medellin v. Dretke
United States Supreme Court, January 25, 2005
Your tax deductible gift can help stop human rights violations and save lives around the world.
Region / Country
Most Viewed
-
December 3, 2025
US: ICE Arrest at FIFA Event Spotlights Dangers for World Cup
-
October 18, 2018
“It’s Not Normal”
-
November 25, 2019
A Dirty Investment
-
November 25, 2024
Haiti: Scarce Protection as Sexual Violence Escalates
-
April 27, 2022
Dress Restrictions Tighten for Afghanistan Girls’ Schools